4.3 Article

A study on the effect of gas shale composition and pore structure on methane sorption

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2018.12.009

关键词

Shale; Methane absolute adsorption; CO2 micropore adsorption; Negative adsorption; Pore-heterogeneity of shale; Void volume estimation

资金

  1. School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds
  2. University of Leeds (Leeds, UK)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ten moist, powdered European shale samples were analyzed for their sorption properties by volumetric method. The adsorption capacities were correlated to the shale organic types and maturity. The pore-size distribution obtained from low-pressure CO2 micropore adsorption was also correlated with the porosity and shale organic types. Furthermore, pore volume and average pore width were taken into consideration to determine the dominant parameters controlling adsorption. To identify the discrepancy between available and actual pore space for adsorption, helium and krypton gases were used for void volume estimation. Methane adsorption isotherms follow Langmuir Type I behavior and, in general, showed a positive trend with Total Organic Content (TOC) and Hg-porosity although some deviations were also observed. Low to moderate level of hysteresis between adsorption and desorption isotherms for some samples was visible, which may be attributed to the experimental uncertainty and existence of heterogeneous pores for shale-methane interaction. The low-pressure micropore adsorption analysis indicated dominance of nanopore and very fine micropores in the shale matrix structure along with associated microporosity of the clay materials. The observed negative adsortion or decline in adsorption isotherm are related to the mismatch of the available pore spaces for helium and methane. In general, He-calibrated isotherms showed higher levels of adsorption than the corresponding Kr-calibrated isotherms although the unit void volume for all samples follow a negative trend with the maximum methane capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据