4.3 Article

A randomized clinical trial comparing mandibular incisor proclination produced by fixed labial appliances and clear aligners

期刊

ANGLE ORTHODONTIST
卷 86, 期 5, 页码 706-712

出版社

E H ANGLE EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC
DOI: 10.2319/101415-686.1

关键词

Clear aligners; Fixed appliances; Tooth movement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare the mandibular incisor proclination produced by fixed labial appliances and third generation clear aligners. Materials and Methods: Patients underwent a course of orthodontic treatment using either fixed labial appliances or clear aligners (Invisalign). Mandibular incisor proclination was measured by comparing pretreatment and near-end treatment lateral cephalograms. Eligibility criteria included adult patients with mild mandibular incisor crowding (<4 mm) and Class I skeletal bases (ANB, 14). The main outcome was the cephalometric change in mandibular incisor inclination to the mandibular plane at the end of treatment. Eligible patients picking a sealed opaque envelope, which indicated their group allocation, was used to achieve randomization. Data was analyzed using a Welch two-sample t-test. Results: Forty-four patients (mean age, 26.4 +/- 7.7 years) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the fixed labial appliance or the clear aligner group. Baseline characteristics were similar for both groups: Fixed appliance mean crowding was 2.1 +/- 1.3 mm vs clear aligner mean crowding, 2.5 +/- 1.3 mm; pretreatment mean mandibular incisor inclination for the fixed appliance group was 90.8.1 +/- 5.4 degrees vs 91.6 +/- 6.4 degrees for the clear aligner group. Fixed appliances produced 5.3 +/- 4.3 degrees of mandibular incisor proclination. Clear aligners proclined the mandibular incisors by 3.4 +/- 3.2 degrees. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P >.05). Conclusion: There was no difference in the amount of mandibular incisor proclination produced by clear aligners and fixed labial appliances in mild crowding cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据