4.5 Article

Occupancy dynamics of semi-aquatic herbivores in riparian systems in Illinois, USA

期刊

ECOSPHERE
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2614

关键词

Castor canadensis; multi-season occupancy models; Ondatra zibethicus; riparian habitat; stream structure

类别

资金

  1. Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Federal Aid Project [W-135-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Streams and local riparian habitats are a product of the landscapes they drain. Consequently, aspects of the landscape, as well as local stream morphology, are likely to affect riparian and stream communities, including occupancy of semi-aquatic mammals. To gain a better understanding of how changing landscapes may affect the occupancy of semi-aquatic mammals, we sought to identify aspects of the riparian system and stream structure at multiple scales that relate to the presence of beaver (Castor canadensis) and muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), including their interactions with mink (Neovison vison) and river otter (Lontra canadensis). We estimated multi-season occupancy using 103 sites sampled over six seasons (2012-2014) in southern Illinois, USA. We hypothesized beaver and muskrat occupancy was related to multiple aspects of landscape and local habitat including land-cover, water availability, human disturbance, stream characteristics, and the presence of other semi-aquatic mammals. Beaver occupancy varied over time and was predicted by stream size, stream density, and land-cover at the landscape scale. Muskrat occupancy also varied over time and was related to local aspects of habitat including percentage of forest in the riparian area, channel incision, land-cover, and aspects of sediment chemistry. Our results indicate the importance of spatial and temporal variation, scale, and food and water availability for these semi-aquatic species. Beaver and muskrat are most likely to be affected by changes to water regimes including availability of permanent water sources due to changing landscapes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据