4.5 Article

Predicting opioid dependence from electronic health records with machine learning

期刊

BIODATA MINING
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13040-019-0193-0

关键词

Opioid epidemic; Opioid dependence; Electronic health records; Electronic medical records; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence

资金

  1. NIH [U54-HL127624, U24-CA224260, OT3-OD025467]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe opioid epidemic in the United States is averaging over 100 deaths per day due to overdose. The effectiveness of opioids as pain treatments, and the drug-seeking behavior of opioid addicts, leads physicians in the United States to issue over 200 million opioid prescriptions every year. To better understand the biomedical profile of opioid-dependent patients, we analyzed information from electronic health records (EHR) including lab tests, vital signs, medical procedures, prescriptions, and other data from millions of patients to predict opioid substance dependence.ResultsWe trained a machine learning model to classify patients by likelihood of having a diagnosis ofsubstance dependence using EHR data from patients diagnosed with substance dependence, along with control patients with no history of substance-related conditions, matched by age, gender, and status of HIV,hepatitis C, and sickle cell disease. The top machine learning classifier using all features achieved a mean area under the receiver operatingcharacteristic (AUROC)curveof similar to 92%, and analysis of the model uncovered associations between basic clinical factors and substance dependence.Additionally, diagnoses, prescriptions, and procedures prior to the diagnoses of substance dependence were analyzed to elucidate the clinical profile of substance-dependent patients, relative to controls.ConclusionsThe predictive model may hold utility for identifying patients at risk of developing dependence, risk of overdose, and opioid-seeking patients that report other symptoms in their visits to the emergency room.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据