4.6 Article

Extraordinary Sensitivity of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Molecules on MoS2 (WS2) Nanodomes/Graphene van der Waals Heterostructure Substrates

期刊

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.201801249

关键词

charge transfer; MoS2; surface-enhanced Raman scattering; TMDs nanodomes; graphene heterostructure; WS2

资金

  1. U.S. Army Research Office [ARO-W911NF-16-1-0029]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF-DMR-1337737, NSF-DMR-1508494]
  3. Jazan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs)/graphene van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures integrate the superior light-solid interaction in TMDs and charge mobility in graphene, and therefore are promising for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Herein, a novel TMD (MoS2 and WS2) nanodome/graphene vdW heterostructure SERS substrate, on which an extraordinary SERS sensitivity is achieved, is reported. Using fluorescent Rhodamine 6G (R6G) as probe molecules, the SERS sensitivity is in the range of 10(-11) to 10(-12) m on the TMD nanodomes/graphene vdW heterostructure substrates using 532 nm Raman excitation, which is comparable to the best sensitivity reported so far using plasmonic metal nanostructures/graphene SERS substrates, and is more than three orders of magnitude higher than that on single-layer TMD and graphene substrates. Density functional theory simulation reveals enhanced electric dipole moments and dipole-dipole interaction at the TMD/graphene vdW interface, yielding an effective means to facilitate an external electrostatic perturbation on the graphene surface and charge transfer. This not only promotes chemical enhancement on SERS, but also enables electromagnetic enhancement of SERS through the excitation of localized surface plasmonic resonance on the TMD nanodomes. This TMD nanodome/graphene vdW heterostructure is therefore promising for commercial applications in high-performance optoelectronics and sensing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据