4.6 Article

Sustainable Production of Carbon Nanoparticles from Olive Pit Biomass: Understanding Proton Transfer in the Excited State on Carbon Dots

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 10493-10500

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00969

关键词

Nanotechnology; Carbon dots; Levulinic acid; Luminescence; Carbohydrates; Surface characterization; NMR spectroscopy

资金

  1. FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, through the Madeira 14-20 Program (project PROEQUIPRAM -Reforco do Investimento em Equipamentos e Infraestruturas Cientificas na RAM) [M1420-01-0145-FEDER-000008]
  2. ARDITI-Agencia Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigacao Tecnologia e Inovcao [M1420-01-0145-FEDER-000005]
  3. CSA [M1420-09-5369-FSE-000001, 002458/2015/132]
  4. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain) [IEDI-2016-00743, CTQ2015-68951-C3-3-R, ENE2017-85819 C2-1-R]
  5. RUDN University, Program 5-100

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Olive pits, a waste product derived from olive oil production, have a high carbohydrate content attractive for biorefineries. Nanotechnology, making possible the preparation of nontoxic carbon-based nanoparticles, namely, carbon dots, provides a compelling opportunity for the valorisation of such waste feedstocks with enormous advantages. In this work, biomass was subjected to a soft one-step treatment in which trifluoroacetic acid and different solid catalysts were used. Fluorescent nanosized (4.5 nm) particles were obtained, displaying the characteristic behavior of carbon dots. These nanoparticles exhibited a fluorescence emission at 500 and 602 nm when treated with the solid catalyst and trifluoroacetic acid, respectively. XPS and NMR analyses showed oxygen-rich content on the surface of the carbon particles which could explain a proton transfer in the excited state (ESIPT effect). Studies to evaluate the effects of synthesized nanoparticles on HEK 293T cells were also performed, showing their biocompatibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据