4.6 Article

Ionic Liquid Pretreatment in Tandem with Recombinant Agarase Cocktail Saccharification of Gelidium amansii for D-Galactose and 3,6-Anhydro-L-Galactose Production

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 7563-7571

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05761

关键词

Biomass dissolution; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Macroalgae; Monosaccharides; Simplex-centroid design

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2018R1D1A1B07043993, 2018R1D1A1B07048107, 2009-0093816]
  2. Ministry of Science and ICT [2015H1D3A1062172]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07048107, 2018R1D1A1B07043993] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

D-Galactose (D-Gal) and 3,6-Anhydro-L-galactose (3,6-L-AHG) are valuable sugars that can be derived from Gelidium amansii. Herein, ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment was used to deconstruct the cell wall of G. amansii without producing any side-products from sugar degradation. It is combined with enzymatic saccharification using recombinant agarases to effectively produce D-Gal and 3,6-L-AHG from IL-treated G. amansii. ILs were screened for the biomass pretreatment as well as the antisolvents for dissolved biomass retrieval from the IL. [Bmim]Ac is the most effective solvent (99% dissolution) and methanol as antisolvent (78% reconstituted G. amansii). Using simplex-centroid design, the optimal loading of three beta-agarases: Aga2, AgaA7, and Aga50D for the first hydrolysis was determined to be at equal fractions (0.33). Addition of alpha-neoagarobiose hydrolase AhgI finally produced maximum yields of 56.5% for D-Gal and 33.7% for 3,6-L-AHG. Given the industrial importance of D-Gal and the high market price of 3,6-L-AHG, results demonstrate the potential of combined IL pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis using recombinant agarases as a green process for sugar production from red macroalgae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据