4.6 Article

From Biomass to Nanomaterials: A Green Procedure for Preparation of Holistic Bamboo Multifunctional Nanocomposites Based On Formic Acid Rapid Fractionation

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 6592-6600

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05502

关键词

Bamboo; Integrated treatment; Cellulose nanocrystals; Lignin nanoparticles; Multifunctional nanocomposite

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. Graduate School of Chemical Engineering at Abo Akademi University
  3. Fortum Foundation
  4. Independent Innovation and Achievements Transformation Project of Shandong Province [2014CGZH0302]
  5. Yellow River Mouth Scholar Program [DYRC20120105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To achieve full utilization of lignocellulosic biomass and easy integration of nanomaterials production, it is essential to develop an efficient fractionation to overcome the highly recalcitrant nature of lignocellulose and facilitate the subsequent valuable conversion. Herein, in a combined process based on the formic acid rapid fractionation of bamboo chips, pure cellulose, and lignin were first obtained as fractionated streams. Compared to wood kraft pulp, the bamboo-originated cellulose was easily converted into cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) using TEMPO oxidation in a relatively short time, which holds greater potential to meet the commercial cost target. The dissolved lignin was processed into nanoparticles (lignin NPs), which exhibited spherical morphology and a uniform particle size distribution. Dispersions of CNCs and lignin NPs were prepared and further filtrated to form nanocomposite membranes. The nanocomposite membranes exhibited a very smooth surface and homogeneous structure. Most impressively, at the CNCs/lignin NPs ratio of 5, the tensile strength and Young's modulus were improved by 44 and 47%, respectively, compared to the pure CNCs film. Owning to the presence of lignin NPs, and the nanocomposites exhibited an effective antibacterial activity against E. coli.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据