4.5 Review

The ecological dynamics of hantavirus diseases: From environmental variability to disease prevention largely based on data from China

期刊

PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006901

关键词

-

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [JQ18025]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81673234, 81460520, 31870400, 41476161]
  3. Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST(YESS) [2018QNRC001]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0600104]
  6. health industry's special research funds for public welfare projects [201502020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hantaviruses can cause hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) in the Americas and hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) in Eurasia. In recent decades, repeated outbreaks of hantavirus disease have led to public concern and have created a global public health burden. Hantavirus spillover from natural hosts into human populations could be considered an ecological process, in which environmental forces, behavioral determinants of exposure, and dynamics at the human-animal interface affect human susceptibility and the epidemiology of the disease. In this review, we summarize the progress made in understanding hantavirus epidemiology and rodent reservoir population biology. We mainly focus on three species of rodent hosts with longitudinal studies of sufficient scale: the striped field mouse (Apodemus agrarius, the main reservoir host for Hantaan virus [HTNV], which causes HFRS) in Asia, the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus, the main reservoir host for Sin Nombre virus [SNV], which causes HPS) in North America, and the bank vole (Myodes glareolus, the main reservoir host for Puumala virus [PUUV], which causes HFRS) in Europe. Moreover, we discuss the influence of ecological factors on human hantavirus disease outbreaks and provide an overview of research perspectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据