4.7 Article

Parametric Heating in a 2D Periodically Driven Bosonic System: Beyond the Weakly Interacting Regime

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW X
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.011047

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF Physics Frontier Center, PFC@JQI [PHY1430094]
  2. ARO MURI program
  3. European Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (H2020-MSCA-IF-2015 Grant) [701034]
  4. Emergent Phenomena in Quantum Systems initiative of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  5. ERC synergy grant UQUAM
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Quantum Algorithm Teams Program
  7. Harvard-MIT CUA (NSF) [DMR-1308435]
  8. AFOSR-MURI Quantum Phases of Matter [FA9550-14-1-0035]
  9. AFOSR-MURI: Photonic Quantum Matter [FA95501610323]
  10. Fulbright Program
  11. FRS-FNRS (Belgium)
  12. ERC Starting Grant TopoCold
  13. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [701034] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We experimentally investigate the effects of parametric instabilities on the short-time heating process of periodically driven bosons in 2D optical lattices with a continuous transverse (tube) degree of freedom. We analyze three types of periodic drives: (i) linear along the x-lattice direction only, (ii) linear along the lattice diagonal, and (iii) circular in the lattice plane. In all cases, we demonstrate that the Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) decay is dominated by the emergence of unstable Bogoliubov modes, rather than scattering in higher Floquet bands, in agreement with recent theoretical predictions. The observed BEC depletion rates are much higher when shaking along both the x and y directions, as opposed to only x or only y. We also report an explosion of the decay rates at large drive amplitudes and suggest a phenomenological description beyond the Bogoliubov theory. In this strongly coupled regime, circular drives heat faster than diagonal drives, which illustrates the nontrivial dependence of the heating on the choice of drive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据