4.8 Article

Synthetic Receptors for the High-Affinity Recognition of O-GlcNAc Derivatives

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 55, 期 10, 页码 3387-3392

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201510611

关键词

biomimetic hosts; carbohydrates; molecular recognition; receptors; supramolecular chemistry

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I028501/1]
  2. Bristol Chemical Synthesis Doctoral Training Centre [EP/G036764/1]
  3. Wellcome Trust [099185/Z/12/Z]
  4. Augustinus Fonden
  5. Oticon Fonden
  6. Lundbeck Foundation
  7. COST Action [CM1005]
  8. Secretaria General de Universidades, Investigacion y Tecnologia (Junta de Andalucia)
  9. Wellcome Trust
  10. Danish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Higher Education [DFF-4181-00206]
  11. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1114107, EP/I028501/1, EP/K035746/1, EP/L011999/1, EP/K03927X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. EPSRC [EP/K035746/1, EP/K03927X/1, EP/I028501/1, EP/L011999/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of a pyrenyl tetraamine with an isophthaloyl spacer has led to two new water-soluble carbohydrate receptors (synthetic lectins). Both systems show outstanding affinities for derivatives of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) in aqueous solution. One receptor binds the methyl glycoside GlcNAc--OMe with K-a approximate to 20000m(-1), whereas the other one binds an O-GlcNAcylated peptide with K-a approximate to 70000m(-1). These values substantially exceed those usually measured for GlcNAc-binding lectins. Slow exchange on the NMR timescale enabled structural determinations for several complexes. As expected, the carbohydrate units are sandwiched between the pyrenes, with the alkoxy and NHAc groups emerging at the sides. The high affinity of the GlcNAcyl-peptide complex can be explained by extra-cavity interactions, raising the possibility of a family of complementary receptors for O-GlcNAc in different contexts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据