4.6 Article

Alleviation of arsenic toxicity by phosphate is associated with its regulation of detoxification, defense, and transport gene expression in barley

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 381-394

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)61955-0

关键词

arsenate; phosphate; transporter; tolerance; toxicity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31330055]
  2. earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-05-02A-01]
  3. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, China (JCIC-MCP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenic (As) contamination in soils has posed a severe threat to safe crop production. The previous studies showed the antagonism between phosphorus (P) and As in plant growth and As uptake, while the mechanisms of alleviating As toxicity by P is not completely clear. Due to the limiting P condition, it is imperative to understand how low P addition can be used to suppress arsenate As (V) uptake and the subsequent mechanisms involved. Thus in this study we investigated the effect of P addition on As uptake, anti-oxidative enzyme activity, and anti-oxidant content, and the relative expression of transport, defense, and detoxification genes using two barley genotypes differing in As toxicity tolerance. P addition significantly reduced As concentration in plant tissues, and caused the great changes in activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase, glutathione content, and the relative expression of examined genes when the plants of the two barley genotypes were exposed to 100 mu mol L-1 As, with ZDB160 (As-tolerant) being much more affected than ZDB475 (As-sensitive). The current results show that P addition can alleviate As toxicity by regulating the expression of As transport, defense, and detoxification genes to a greater extent in As tolerance of barley, suggesting the possibility of controlling As uptake and toxicity by applying low amount of P fertilizers in the As-contaminated soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据