4.5 Article

Concentration, exchange and source identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil, air and tree bark from the Middle-Lower Yangtze Plain, China

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 1276-1283

出版社

TURKISH NATL COMMITTEE AIR POLLUTION RES & CONTROL-TUNCAP
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2019.02.011

关键词

PAHs; PUF based air sampler; Tree bark; Soil; The plain along the Yangtze River (Anhui section); Source identification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41203075]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, China [1708085MD88, 1808085QD98]
  3. Natural Science Foundation for the Higher Education Institutions of Anhui Province of China [KJ 2018A0317]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were detected in tree bark, soil and air samples of the plain along the Yangtze River (Anhui section) which belongs to the Middle-Lower Yangtze Plain. Sigma(15)PAHs in tree bark, soil and air (collected using PUF based passive samplers) ranged from 27 to 1300 ng g (-1) dw, 140-5300 ng g(-1) dw, and 29-210 ngm(-3), respectively. The proportions of 3- and 4-ring PAHs were significantly higher in air and tree bark samples, whereas 5- and 6-ring PAHs were significantly higher in soils. Distribution of PAHs in barks of slow-growing wood (camphor tree) was similar with that in PUFs, and variation of PAHs in tree barks from same species was less than that from different species. Furthermore, all the 4-, 5- and 6-ring PAHs are not in equilibrium between air and bark. Air-soil exchange of 3- and 4-ring PAHs was dominated by net volatilization, while 5- and 6-ring PAHs were mostly reach the equilibrium. For the source identification of air-borne PAHs, diagnostic ratios of PAHs with molecular mass of 202 and 276 may be more appropriate as these ratios are more conservative. Through comprehensive analysis using diagnostic ratios and principal component analysis, combustion of petroleum, coal and biomass were the major sources of PAHs in the environmental compartments of the study area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据