4.7 Article

A subtelomeric region affects telomerase-negative replicative senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-38000-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [ERC-2010-StG 260906-D-END]
  2. Mairie de Paris (Programme Emergences)
  3. Fondation de la Recherche Medicale (equipe labellisee)
  4. French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the Investissements d'Avenir Program (LabEx Dynamo) [ANR-11-LABX-0011-01, ANR-16-CE12-0026]
  5. CancerTelSys in the E: med program of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01ZX1302]
  6. Hartmut Hoffmann-Berling International Graduate School PhD fellowship
  7. Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In eukaryotes, telomeres determine cell proliferation potential by triggering replicative senescence in the absence of telomerase. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, senescence is mainly dictated by the first telomere that reaches a critically short length, activating a DNA-damage-like response. How the corresponding signaling is modulated by the telomeric structure and context is largely unknown. Here we investigated how subtelomeric elements of the shortest telomere in a telomerase-negative cell influence the onset of senescence. We found that a 15 kb truncation of the 7L subtelomere widely used in studies of telomere biology affects cell growth when combined with telomerase inactivation. This effect is likely not explained by (i) elimination of sequence homology at chromosome ends that would compromise homology-directed DNA repair mechanisms; (ii) elimination of the conserved subtelomeric X-element; (iii) elimination of a gene that would become essential in the absence of telomerase; and (iv) heterochromatinization of inner genes, causing the silencing of an essential gene in replicative senescent cells. This works contributes to better delineate subtelomere functions and their impact on telomere biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据