4.7 Article

Cyclized NDGA modifies dynamic α-synuclein monomers preventing aggregation and toxicity

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39480-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Pennsylvania Center
  2. Landmark ESFRI project
  3. NIH [NS081033]
  4. NSF [DGE-1321851]
  5. Parkinson's Disease Foundation [PF-RVSA-SFW-1754]
  6. Age Related Neurodegenerative Disease
  7. COST Action [BM1403]
  8. NIH NINDS [R01 NS079955]
  9. Fondazione CR Firenze
  10. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant (NSERC-DG) [165915]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing evidence implicates alpha-synuclein aggregation as a key driver of neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease (PD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Herein, the molecular and structural mechanisms of inhibiting alpha-synuclein aggregation by novel analogs of nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA), a phenolic dibenzenediol lignan, were explored using an array of biochemical and biophysical methodologies. NDGA analogs induced modest, progressive compaction of monomeric alpha-synuclein, preventing aggregation into amyloid-like fibrils. This conformational remodeling preserved the dynamic adoption of alpha-helical conformations, which are essential for physiological membrane interactions. Oxidation-dependent NDGA cyclization was required for the interaction with monomeric alpha-synuclein. NDGA analog-pretreated alpha-synuclein did not aggregate even without NDGA-analogs in the aggregation mixture. Strikingly, NDGA-pretreated alpha-synuclein suppressed aggregation of naive untreated aggregation-competent monomeric a-synuclein. Further, cyclized NDGA reduced alpha-synuclein-driven neurodegeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans. The cyclized NDGA analogs may serve as a platform for the development of small molecules that stabilize aggregation-resistant alpha-synuclein monomers without interfering with functional conformations yielding potential therapies for PD and related disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据