4.7 Article

How Low-Income Mothers Select and Adapt Recipes and Implications for Promoting Healthy Recipes Online

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu11020339

关键词

low-income mothers; focus group; nutrition; Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); social media; recipe; social marketing; children; feeding behavior; website development

资金

  1. Oregon Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) [152303.2]
  2. SNAP-Ed

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe a 5-year (2011-2015) qualitative evaluation to refine the content/delivery of the Food Hero social marketing campaign recipes to low-income mothers. Objectives were to: (1) identify characteristics looked for in recipes; (2) determine recipe sources; (3) understand motivation for seeking new recipes and recipe adaptations; and (4) identify recipe website characteristics users valued. Nine focus groups (n = 55) were conducted in Portland, Oregon. Participants (35-52 years) were primary caregivers for one child, the primary household food shoppers/preparers, enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and able to speak/read English. Participants reported having go-to family recipes and regularly searching online for new recipes, especially those using ingredients available/preferred by family members. Recipe websites with highest appeal were polished and engaging to mothers/children, offered user-ratings/comments and were reachable from search engines. Results identified key recommendations: (1) understand the target audience; (2) aim to add healthy/customizable recipes to family go-to' recipe rotations and understand the impact of generational influences (e.g. how mothers/grandmothers cooked) on family meals; and (3) create websites that meet target audience criteria. Seeking the target audience's input about the content/delivery of recipes is an important formative step for obesity-prevention projects that include healthy recipes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据