4.7 Article

Maresin 1 mitigates renal ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice via inhibition of the TLR4/MAPK/NF-kappa B pathways and activation of the Nrf2 pathway

期刊

DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 739-745

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S188654

关键词

renal ischemia/reperfusion injury; Maresin 1; TLR4; MAPK; NF-kappa B; Nrf2

资金

  1. Nanjing Medical University [2016NJMUZD084]
  2. Six One Project [LGY2017052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Inflammation and oxidative stress play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of renal ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI). Maresin 1 (MaR1), which has shown strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, was recently reported to have protective properties in several different animal models. Aim: The objectives of our study were to determine whether MaR1 alleviates renal IRI and to identify the underlying mechanisms. Materials and methods: The mouse model in this study was induced by ischemia of the left kidney for 45 minutes and by nephrectomy of the right kidney. All mice were intravenously injected with a vehicle or MaR1. Renal histopathologic changes, function, proinflammatory cytokines, and oxidative stress were assessed. The expression of proteins was measured by Western blot. Results: The results indicated that MaR1 markedly protected against renal IRI. The protective effects were accompanied by the reduction of histologic changes and reduction of renal dysfunction. Meanwhile, MaR1 remarkably mitigated renal IRI-induced inflammation and oxidative stress. In addition, our results showed that MaR1 significantly inhibited the expression of TLR4 and the expression of phosphorylated Erk, JNK, and P38. Furthermore, MaR1 decreased the nuclear translocation of NF-kappa B and increased the nuclear translocation of Nrf2. Conclusion: MaR1 protects against renal IRI by inhibiting the TLR4/MAPK/NF-kappa B pathways, which mediate anti-inflammation, and by activating the Nrf2 pathway, which mediates antioxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据