4.8 Article

Rational Design of Hierarchical Ceramic-in-Polymer and Polymer-in-Ceramic Electrolytes for Dendrite-Free Solid-State Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201804004

关键词

composite electrolytes; dendrite suppression; garnet particles; hierarchical structures; solid-state Li metal batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771222, 51532002]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0104300]
  3. Taishan Scholars Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid polymer electrolytes as one of the promising solid-state electrolytes have received extensive attention due to their excellent flexibility. However, the issues of lithium (Li) dendrite growth still hinder their practical applications in solid-state batteries (SSBs). Herein, composite electrolytes from ceramic-in-polymer (CIP) to polymer-in-ceramic (PIC) with different sizes of garnet particles are investigated for their effectiveness in dendrite suppression. While the CIP electrolyte with 20 vol% 200 nm Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 (LLZTO) particles (CIP-200 nm) exhibits the highest ionic conductivity of 1.6 x 10(-4) S cm(-1) at 30 degrees C and excellent flexibility, the PIC electrolyte with 80 vol% 5 mu m LLZTO (PIC-5 mu m) shows the highest tensile strength of 12.7 MPa. A sandwich-type composite electrolyte (SCE) with hierarchical garnet particles (a PIC-5 mu m interlayer sandwiched between two CIP-200 nm thin layers) is constructed to simultaneously achieve dendrite suppression and excellent interfacial contact with Li metal. The SCE enables highly stable Li plating/stripping cycling for over 400 h at 0.2 mA cm(-2) at 30 degrees C. The LiFePO4/SCE/Li cells also demonstrate excellent cycle performance at room temperature. Fabricating sandwich-type composite electrolytes with hierarchical filler designs can be an effective strategy to achieve dendrite-free SSBs with high performance and high safety at room temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据