4.8 Article

Graphene Wrapped FeSe2 Nano-Microspheres with High Pseudocapacitive Contribution for Enhanced Na-Ion Storage

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201900356

关键词

burr globule-like; graphene; nano-microspheres; pseudocapacitive contribution; sodium-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51572300, 51774333]
  2. U. S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office
  3. DOE Office of Science by UChicago Argonne, LLC [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudocapacitance is a Faradaic process that involves surface or near surface redox reactions. Increasing the pseudocapacitive contribution is one of the most effective means to improve the rate performance of electrode materials. In this study, graphene oxide is used as a template to in situ synthesize burr globule-like FeSe2/graphene hybrid (B-FeSe2/G) using a facile one-step hydrothermal method. Structural characterization demonstrates that graphene layers not only wrap the surfaces of FeSe2 particles, but also stretch into the interior of these particles, as a result of which the unique nano-microsphere structure is successfully established. When serving as anode material for Na-ion batteries, B-FeSe2/G hybrid displays high electrochemical performance in the voltage range of 0.5-2.9 V. The B-FeSe2/G hybrid has high reversible capacity of 521.6 mAh center dot g(-1) at 1.0 A g(-1). Meanwhile, after 400 cycles, high discharge capacity of 496.3 mAh g(-1) is obtained at a rate of 2.5 A g(-1), with a high columbic efficiency of 96.6% and less than 1.0% loss of discharge capacity. Even at the ultrahigh rate of 10 A g(-1), a specific capacity of 316.8 mAh g(-1) can be achieved. Kinetic analyses reveal that the excellent performance of the B-FeSe2/G hybrid is largely attributed to the high pseudocapacitive contribution induced by the special nano-micro structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据