4.8 Article

Hydrous RuO2-Decorated MXene Coordinating with Silver Nanowire Inks Enabling Fully Printed Micro-Supercapacitors with Extraordinary Volumetric Performance

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201803987

关键词

flexible micro-supercapacitors; MXene; ruthenium(IV) oxide nanoparticles; screen printing; silver nanowires

资金

  1. NSFC [51872146, 51673099, 91633301, 21421001]
  2. Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission in China [17JCZDJC30200]
  3. MoST [2016YFA0200200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fabrication of fully printable, flexible micro-supercapacitors (MSCs) with high energy and power density remains a significant technological hurdle. To overcome this grand challenge, the 2D material MXene has garnered significant attention for its application, among others, as a printable electrode material for high performing electrochemical energy storage devices. Herein, a facile and in situ process is proposed to homogeneously anchor hydrous ruthenium oxide (RuO2) nanoparticles on Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheets. The resulting RuO2@MXene nanosheets can associate with silver nanowires (AgNWs) to serve as a printable electrode with micrometer-scale resolution for high performing, fully printed MSCs. In this printed nanocomposite electrode, the RuO2 nanoparticles contribute high pseudocapacitance while preventing the MXene nanosheets from restacking, ensuring an effective ion highway for electrolyte ions. The AgNWs coordinate with the RuO2@MXene to guarantee the rheological property of the electrode ink, and provide a highly conductive network architecture for rapid charge transport. As a result, MSCs printed from the nanocomposite inks demonstrate volumetric capacitances of 864.2 F cm(-3) at 1 mV s(-1), long-term cycling performance (90% retention after 10 000 cycles), good rate capability (304.0 F cm(-3) at 2000 mV s(-1)), outstanding flexibility, remarkable energy (13.5 mWh cm(-3)) and power density (48.5 W cm(-3)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据