4.8 Article

Selective Production of Aromatics Directly from Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 3866-3876

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00640

关键词

CO2 hydrogenation; aromatics; Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; spinel oxides; hierarchical zeolites; Bronsted acid sites

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773286, U1832162, 91845105]
  2. Transformational Technologies for Clean Energy and Demonstration, Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA21090204, XDA21090201]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2018330]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19QA1409900]
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [16YFA0202802, 2017YFB0602202, 2018YFB0604700]
  6. Shanghai Functional Platform for Innovation Low Carbon Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conversion of carbon dioxide (CO2) to fuels and chemicals with the help of renewable hydrogen (H-2) is a very attractive approach to reduce CO2 emissions and replace dwindling fossil fuels. However, it is still a great challenge to synthesize aromatics directly from CO2 hydrogenation, because CO2 is thermodynamically very stable, and the aromatics are highly unsaturated products with complex structures. Here, we demonstrate that the combination of the sodium-modified spinel oxide ZnFeOx, which alone shows excellent performance for CO2 hydrogenation to olefins, and hierarchical nanocrystalline HZSM-5 aggregates can realize a highly efficient synthesis of aromatics directly from CO2 and H-2. The maximum of aromatics selectivity was up to 75.6% among all hydrocarbons at 41.2% CO2 conversion. Additionally, the selectivity toward CO and CH4 is usually less than 20% over this catalyst system. The suitable amount of the residual sodium, hierarchical pore structure, and appropriate density of Bronsted acid sites endow the composite catalyst with an outstanding aromatics yield and high catalytic stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据