4.8 Article

Covalent Inhibition Mechanism of Antidiabetic Drugs-Vildagliptin vs Saxagliptin

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 2292-2302

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b05051

关键词

enzyme catalysis; QM/MM; DPP-4; vildagliptin; saxagliptin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773313, 21803080]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Founds for Distinguished Young Scholars [2016A030306038]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0202600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vildagliptin (VIL) and saxagliptin (SAX) are two covalent drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The principal pharmacological effects of VIL and SAX are known to arise from their biochemical reactions at the active site of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4), a serine protease that rapidly inactivates incretin hormones in plasma. However, the details of the catalytic mechanisms and the origin of the different pharmacokinetics behavior for the two scaffold-similar drugs are less clear. By employing quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical molecular dynamics simulations in this work, it is illuminated that the catalytic process involves two major steps: reversible covalent bonding which covalently modifies the antidiabetic target DPP-4 and irreversible hydrolysis reaction which converts the drugs into inactive metabolites. The reaction free energy profiles indicate that VIL is dissociated from DPP-4 mainly through the hydrolysis pathway, while SAX overwhelmingly through the reverse process of covalent bonding. Therefore, the inhibition is pseudoirreversible for VIL, while reversible for SAX. Further comparative studies reveal that the 4,5-methylene substituent of pyrrolidine ring in SAX is responsible for the different dissociation kinetics features and its higher inhibitory activity compared to the VIL. All these findings are in agreement with the previously reported experimental results and guidable for further covalent drug design toward DPP-4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据