4.8 Article

Multiple plant diversity components drive consumer communities across ecosystems

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09448-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [DFG FOR 891/1-3, DFG FOR 1451]
  2. Sino-German Centre for Research Promotion [GZ 524, 592, 698, 699, 785, 1020]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 30710103907, 30930005]
  4. Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  5. Max Planck Society
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  7. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig [DFG FZT 118]
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [677232]
  9. Open Access Publication Fund of the Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humans modify ecosystems and biodiversity worldwide, with negative consequences for ecosystem functioning. Promoting plant diversity is increasingly suggested as a mitigation strategy. However, our mechanistic understanding of how plant diversity affects the diversity of heterotrophic consumer communities remains limited. Here, we disentangle the relative importance of key components of plant diversity as drivers of herbivore, predator, and parasitoid species richness in experimental forests and grasslands. We find that plant species richness effects on consumer species richness are consistently positive and mediated by elevated structural and functional diversity of the plant communities. The importance of these diversity components differs across trophic levels and ecosystems, cautioning against ignoring the fundamental ecological complexity of biodiversity effects. Importantly, plant diversity effects on higher trophic-level species richness are in many cases mediated by modifications of consumer abundances. In light of recently reported drastic declines in insect abundances, our study identifies important pathways connecting plant diversity and consumer diversity across ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据