4.8 Article

Intestinal epithelial N-acylphosphatidylethanolamine phospholipase D links dietary fat to metabolic adaptations in obesity and steatosis

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-08051-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. FNRS
  2. FRSM (Fonds de la recherche scientifique medicale, Belgium) [J.0084.15, 3.4579.11]
  3. Projet de Recherche [T.0138.14]
  4. Action de Recherche Concertee (Communaute francaise de Belgique) [12/17-047]
  5. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  7. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  8. FRFSWELBIO [WELBIO-CGR-2017C-02]
  9. Funds Baillet Latour (Grant for Medical Research 2015)
  10. ERC Starting Grant 2013 (European Research Council) [336452-ENIGMO]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Variations in N-acylethanolamines (NAE) levels are associated with obesity and metabolic comorbidities. Their role in the gut remains unclear. Therefore, we generated a mouse model of inducible intestinal epithelial cell (IEC)-specific deletion of N-acylphosphatidylethanolamine phospholipase D (NAPE-PLD), a key enzyme involved in NAE biosynthesis (Napepld(Delta IEC)). We discovered that Napepld(Delta IEC) mice are hyperphagic upon first high-fat diet (HFD) exposure, and develop exacerbated obesity and steatosis. These mice display hypothalamic Pomc neurons dysfunctions and alterations in intestinal and plasma NAE and 2-acylglycerols. After long-term HFD, Napepld(Delta IEC) mice present reduced energy expenditure. The increased steatosis is associated with higher gut and liver lipid absorption. Napepld(Delta IEC) mice display altered gut microbiota. Akkermansia muciniphila administration partly counteracts the IEC NAPE-PLD deletion effects. In conclusion, intestinal NAPE-PLD is a key sensor in nutritional adaptation to fat intake, gut-to-brain axis and energy homeostasis and thereby constitutes a novel target to tackle obesity and related disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据