4.8 Article

Fire-derived organic matter retains ammonia through covalent bond formation

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08401-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation's BREAD Program [IOS-0965336]
  2. Cornell University's David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future
  3. Towards Sustainability Foundation
  4. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future Impact through Innovation Fund
  5. USDA Hatch [NYC-125443]
  6. McKnight Foundation
  7. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  8. National Research Council Canada
  9. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  10. Province of Saskatchewan
  11. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  12. University of Saskatchewan
  13. NSF MRSEC program [DMR-1120296, DMR-1719875]
  14. Australian Research Council [LIEF LE0989541]
  15. NSF IGERT Program [DGE-0903371, DGE-1069193]
  16. NSF GRFP [DGE-1144153]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fire-derived organic matter, often referred to as pyrogenic organic matter (PyOM), is present in the Earth's soil, sediment, atmosphere, and water. We investigated interactions of PyOM with ammonia (NH3) gas, which makes up much of the Earth's reactive nitrogen (N) pool. Here we show that PyOM's NH3 retention capacity under ambient conditions can exceed 180 mg N g(-1) PyOM-carbon, resulting in a material with a higher N content than any unprocessed plant material and most animal manures. As PyOM is weathered, NH3 retention increases sixfold, with more than half of the N retained through chemisorption rather than physisorption. Near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy reveal that a variety of covalent bonds form between NH3-N and PyOM, more than 10% of which contained heterocyclic structures. We estimate that through these mechanisms soil PyOM stocks could retain more than 600-fold annual NH3 emissions from agriculture, exerting an important control on global N cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据