4.4 Article

Electrospun gelatin/PCL and collagen/PCL scaffolds for modulating responses of bone marrow endothelial progenitor cells

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 3717-3726

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.7387

关键词

corneal endothelium; scaffolds; electrospun nanofibrous membrane; gelatin; collagen; bone marrow endothelial progenitor cell

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81370992, 81770332, 81570812, 81500765, 81600774, 81601622]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai [17DZ2260100]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) [2015AA020311]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grand Support [20161421]
  5. Youth Science and Technology Talent Sail Plan of Shanghai [15YF1407400]
  6. Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning Found [20144Y0221]
  7. Shanghai Young Doctor Training Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The determination of potential transplantable substrates and substitution cells for corneal endothelium transplantation may compensate for the shortage of cornea donors. Appropriate biodegradable and biocompatible tissue-engineered substratum with seed cells for endothelial keratoplasty has been increasingly studied. In the present study, electrospun gelatin/polycaprolactone (PCL) and collagen/PCL scaffolds were successfully established. Bone marrow endothelial progenitor cells (BEPCs) were cultured on these scaffolds to determine whether the scaffolds may promote the proliferation of BEPCs as well as maintain stem cell characteristics. Two variations of hybrid scaffolds, collagen/PCL (70% collagen and 30% PCL) and gelatin/PCL (70% gelatin and 30% PCL), were established via electrospinning. Microscopic structure, hydrophilicity and wettability of the two scaffolds were subsequently investigated. BEPCs were separately cultured on the scaffolds and were also seeded on glass slides to establish the control group. Furthermore, cell morphology; adherence, as determined by investigation of F-actin expression levels; proliferation, as determined via Cell Counting Kit-8 assays, Ki-67 staining and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) staining; and stem cell markers, as determined by cluster of differentiation (CD)-34 and CD-133 protein expression levels; were investigated. In addition, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed to determine gene expression. The two nanofiber scaffolds were established using electrospun techniques with expected hydrophilicity, wettability and biocompatibility. BEPCs were revealed to spread well on and strongly adhere to the collagen/PCL (70:30) and gelatin/PCL (70:30) scaffolds. Furthermore, Ki-67 and BrdU staining results revealed greater levels of positive dots on the two hybrid scaffolds compared with the control group. CD-34 and CD-133 protein staining demonstrated increased levels of fluorescence intensity on scaffolds compared with the control group. Furthermore, increased expression levels of differentiation markers, such as ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2, leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 and CD166, were detected on both scaffolds. RT-qPCR results demonstrated that the expression of caspase-3, which is associated with apoptosis, was decreased on the two scaffolds compared with in the control group. The expression of inflammatory factors, including interleukin (IL)-1, exhibited a significant decrease on the gelatin/PCL scaffold compared with in the control group; whereas the difference between the expression level of IL-1 exhibited by the collagen/PCL group and the control group were not markedly different. Electrospun collagen/PCL and gelatin/PCL scaffolds exhibited the potential to enhance the adherence and proliferation of BEPCs. BEPCs cultured on the two scaffolds demonstrated increased stem cell characteristics and differentiation potential. Electrospun gelatin/PCL and collagen/PCL scaffolds may represent a promising substratum in tissue-engineered corneal endothelium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据