4.5 Article

The European trade ban on wild birds reduced invasion risks

期刊

CONSERVATION LETTERS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12631

关键词

biological invasions; nonnative species; pet markets; trade regulations; wild-caught birds

资金

  1. V Plan Propio de Investigacion', Universidad de Sevilla (Spain)
  2. Division of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of Queens College, City University of New York
  3. Fundacion Repsol
  4. Junta de Andalucia, Spain [P07RNM02918, P08-RNM-4014]
  5. Project Estacion Biologica de Donana Severo Ochoa [SEV-2012-0262]
  6. Esfri-Lifewatch Donana [AIC-A-2011-0706]
  7. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie [752149]
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [752149] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

International wildlife trade is a major source of current biological invasions. However, the power of trade regulations to reduce invasion risks at large, continental scales has not been empirically assessed. The European wild bird trade ban was implemented in 2005 to counter the spread of the avian flu. We tested whether the ban reduced invasion risk in two European countries, where 398 nonnative bird species were introduced into the wild from 1912 to 2015. The number of newly introduced species per year increased exponentially until 2005 (in parallel with the volume of wild bird importations), and then sharply decreased in subsequent years. Interestingly, a rapid trade shift from wild-caught birds to captive-bred birds, which have lower invasive potential than wild-caught birds, allowed the maintenance of bird availability in markets. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of a trade ban for preventing biological invasions without impacting the ability to meet societal demands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据