4.4 Article

Interoperability: A conceptual framework to bridge the gap between multifunctional and multisystem urban flood management

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12535

关键词

integrated flood risk management; resilience; urban drainage; water sensitive urban design

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/P004180/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/P004296/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/P004296/1, EP/P004261/2, EP/P004180/1, EP/P004261/1, EP/I030735/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban flood management is increasingly expected to be multifunctional to integrate with the existing functioning of cities. Locally, this led to the development of sustainable urban water drainage designs, while at larger scales, blue-green or water-sensitive cities are considered as examples for how cities should function. Upscaling local designs to city-scale flood resilience is not straightforward, however, due to the complexity of physical infrastructure and socio-economic interactions within urban systems and requires system-of-systems thinking. To this end, we introduce the concept interoperability to guide transition from local multifunctionality to city-scale multisystem flood management, through actively managing connections between infrastructure systems to convey, divert, and store flood water. While flood management is already based on these connections, interoperability is about explicitly emphasising them to explore and create opportunities to facilitate the integration of systems for flood management. The main research need arising from this conceptualisation is to determine how spatial data on infrastructure, environment, and social characteristics in urban areas can serve as a basis to identify opportunities and barriers for interoperability. By introducing interoperability and the research needs arising from it, a framework is created to facilitate and encourage practical thinking and discussion about system integration in urban flood management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据