4.7 Article

Global Dynamics of Stored Precipitation Water in the Topsoil Layer From Satellite and Reanalysis Data

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 3328-3346

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018WR023166

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA Terrestrial Hydrology Program [NNX12AP75G]
  2. NASA [14148, NNX12AP75G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The amount of soil water in the topsoil layer (from 0 to 10 cm) has been regarded as a key factor in controlling land-atmosphere interaction by determining the fraction of net radiation. In the present study, we investigate spatial trends of the stored precipitation fraction in the topsoil layer for varying vegetation and aridity indices by utilizing four satellites and two reanalysis data sets on a global scale. Using the Budyko framework, we relate climate regimes to the stored precipitation fraction on a global scale. A positive relation between the stored precipitation fraction with aridity index and a negative relation between the stored precipitation fraction and free parameter, vegetation optical depth, and isohydric slope are discovered. Even though the stored precipitation fraction values were calculated from different soil moisture and precipitation sources, they share an similar spatial trend: the drier and less vegetated the soil is, the more precipitation is retained in the top layer of the soil. Specifically, the topsoil retains 37% +/- 11% of precipitated water three days after a rainfall event where the aridity index was greater than 5. Over wet and forest areas, due to large runoff fluxes and plants intercepting water before the precipitated water reached the ground, the topsoil retains 21% +/- 2% of precipitated water three days after a rainfall event. Furthermore, by using the modeled data sets in the calculation of the stored precipitation fraction metric, we are able to conduct a sensitivity analysis of F-P(f) metrics with respect to different sampling frequency values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据