4.7 Article

A Novel Method for Agricultural Drought Risk Assessment

期刊

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 2033-2047

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-019-02225-8

关键词

Grain yield; Agricultural drought risk; Assessment; Heilongjiang

资金

  1. Philosophy and Social Science Research Project of Heilongjiang Province [17GLC120]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51479032, 51579044, 51609039]
  3. Northeast Agricultural University Young Talents Foundation Project of Northeast Agricultural University [18QC66]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change, increased temperatures and imbalanced precipitation distributions will potentially increase the local drought risk in certain areas. Drought assessment can identify the hidden dangers of drought and provide a theoretical basis for disaster prevention and mitigation. In this paper, a new agricultural drought risk assessment method proposed from the perspective of grain yield. The first principal components of precipitation, temperature, humidity and soil moisture represent hazard factors. The sensitive yield, which represents the sensitivity, was separated from the grain yield using a regression method. Additionally, the trend component of the grain yield represents the adaptive capacity, and the crop planting area represents exposure. Based on these definitions, the concepts of unit drought risk and regional drought risk are proposed. Four cities in Heilongjiang Province, which has the highest grain yield of any province in China, were used as application examples, and the spatial and temporal variation in the agricultural drought risk were analyzed. Application example show that the method for evaluating agricultural drought presented in this paper is reasonable in a statistical sense. The process for calculating sensitivity and adaptability shows that this method is suitable for arid and semi-arid areas, where grain yield is sensitive to hazard factors, and areas where grain yield has a certain trend.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据