4.8 Article

Chlorella vulgaris enhance the photodegradation of chlortetracycline in aqueous solution via extracellular organic matters (EOMs): Role of triplet state EOMs

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 35-41

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.076

关键词

Algae; Photodegradation; Chlortetracycline; Extracellular organic matters; Triplet states

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [8182037]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578066, 51608036]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015ZCQ-HJ-02]
  4. Major Science and Technology for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2015ZX07203-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Algae, which are ubiquitous in surface waters (e.g., lakes, ponds, wetlands) may play an important role in sunlight-driven transformation of compounds. This study is to investigate the role of algae (Chlorella Vulgaris) in chlortetracycline (CTC) photolysis and explore the photosensitive mechanism. The algae were found to significantly accelerate the photodegradation rate of CTC and extracellular organic matters (EOMs) were confirmed to be the major active substances. Triplet state EOMs ((EOMs)-E-3*) were verified to be the dominant reactive species with 93% contribution to the indirect photodegradation rate of CTC, while (OH)-O-center dot and O-1(2) contributed minor (7%). The steady-state concentration of (EOMs)-E-3* was determined by probe compounds (2,4,6-trimethylphenol) to be 3.50 x 10(-14) -1.88 x 10(-13) M with the increase of EOMs from 2.0 to 8.0 mg L. The rate constant for reaction of (EOMs)-E-3* with CTC was calculated to be 3.17 x 10(9)M(-1) s(-1). (EOMs)-E-3* were found to react with CTC mainly via electron transfer, on basis of susceptible reaction of (EOMs)-E-3* with the hydroxyl and amidogen groups in CTC. In addition, the energy transfer of (EOMs)-E-3* to CTC was possible according to the higher energy of (EOMs)-E-3* than that of triplet CTC. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据