4.7 Article

The transformation of different dissolved organic matter subfractions and distribution of heavy metals during food waste and sugarcane leaves co-composting

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 636-644

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.005

关键词

Composting; Dissolved organic matter; Heavy metals; Subfractions; EEM-FL; ICP-MS

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi [2017GXNSFAA198345]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a heterogeneous fraction, dissolved organic matter (DOM) in a compost is the most active because of its direct supply of energy sources for microbes. Also, the transfer and distribution of heavy metals in the DOM fraction attract many attentions of researchers. To this end, the dynamics of humic acids (HA), fulvic acids (FA), hydrophobic neutrals (HoN), and hydrophilic (Hi) fractions derived from DOM was investigated in this study, and the transformation of different DOM subfractions and distribution of heavy metals during food waste and sugarcane leaves co-composting were assessed by excitation-emission matrix fluorescence (EEM-FL) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), respectively. The results revealed that HA transformed from polycyclic aromatic humic acid-like to polycarboxylic humic acid-like and FA changed from soluble microbial products (SMP) to humic acid-like; Hi and HoN composed mainly of SMP substances; FA showed more abundant compositions, such as SMP, humic acidlike and tryptophan. Heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn) were redistributed among different DOM subfractions in the thermophilic phase of composting. Compost DOM and its subfractions showed obvious effects on germination index (GI), biomass, root length, shoot length and healthy index of Chinese cabbage seedlings. These findings shed some novel lights into the dynamic composition and characteristics of DOM subfractions and their impacts on heavy metals distribution in a composting process. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据