4.3 Article

Incidence and risk factors for ketosis in grazing dairy cattle in the Cundi-Boyacencian Andean plateau, Colombia

期刊

TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 1481-1487

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-019-01835-z

关键词

Ketosis; Dairy cows; Relative risk; Risk factor; Epidemiology; Grazing cattle

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia [B.CFMVZ-355-17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ketosis is a metabolic disorder that has an important impact on health and productivity in dairy cattle during early lactation. In Colombia, the incidence and risk factors for ketosis development have not been studied. The objectives of the present study were to determine the incidence of subclinical (SCK) and clinical ketosis (CK) and to determine the risk factors associated with ketosis within the first 6weeks of lactation in dairy cattle in Colombia. A prospective cohort study was carried out. A convenience sample of 150 lactating dairy cows from ten commercial dairy farms in the Cundi-Boyacencian Andean plateau were tested weekly using a point of care device to measure -hydroxybutyrate during the first 6weeks of lactation. Incidence of SCK and CK was calculated. Risk factors were evaluated using a survey for each animal and for each farm. Potential risk factors were evaluated using a X-2 test, Relative Risk was calculated for significant variables by the X-2 test (P0.05) and these variables were included in the logistic regression model. Cumulative incidence of SCK was 25.33%, 3.33% for CK, and overall incidence of ketosis was 26%. In the logistic regression model, parity 3 or more, herd size >150 animals, body condition score 3, retained placenta, and metritis were determined as risk factors for ketosis. The results of this study confirm previous reports in which a high body condition score, increased parity, herd size, retained placenta, and metritis are associated with an increased risk of ketosis in stabled and grazing cattle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据