4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Oxidative DNA Damage Is Increased in Living Kidney Donors

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 1049-1053

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.011

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Long-term consequences of donor nephrectomy might be reduced kidney function, increased risk for cardiovascular disease, and impaired quality of life. The purpose of the current cross-sectional study was to evaluate the relationship between clinical, laboratory, and donation-specific outcomes of living kidney donors and systemic oxidative DNA damage. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study and assessed retrospectively pre- and postdonation data from 60 donors who donated between 2010 and 2015. Plasma malondialdehyde levels and 8-hydroxy-20-deoxyguanosine/deoxyguanosine ratio (8-OHdG/dG ratio) were determined as oxidative stress markers. Catalase, carbonic anhydrase, and paraoxonase (PON) activities were measured as antioxidants. Results. Approximately 3 years after donation, the hypertensive donor ratio was 12%, and 11% of the donors had glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Mean serum urea (P =.001) and serum creatinine levels (P =.001) were increased; creatinine clearance level (126.2 +/- 35.5 vs 94.6 +/- 26.8, P =.001) was decreased in the postdonation period. There was a significant positive correlation between predonation serum urea and 8-0HdG/dG ratio (r = 0.338, P =.016) and predonation serum creatinine and 8-0HdG/dG ratio (r = 0.442, P =.001), while there was a significant negative correlation between serum creatinine and PON activity (r = -0.545, P <.001). Conclusion. Our data have demonstrated that kidney donors exhibit increased oxidative DNA damage and decreased antioxidant activity. We propose that predonation serum creatinine is positively correlated with 8-0HdG/dG ratio and negatively correlated with antioxidant PON activity. This is the first study to demonstrate that plasma oxidative DNA damage increases in healthy kidney donors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据