4.7 Article

Desorption electrospray ionization-high resolution mass spectrometry for the analysis of unknown materials: The phytosanitary product case

期刊

TALANTA
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 350-356

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.10.038

关键词

Ambient mass spectrometry; Desorption electrospray ionization; High-resolution mass spectrometry; Unknown materials; Unknown compounds; Triphenyltin compounds; Kendrick mass defect

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ2015-63968-C2-1-P]
  2. Agency for Administration of University and Research Grants (Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain) [2017SGR-310]
  3. University of Barcelona

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we tested the potential of desorption electrospray ionization-high resolution mass spectrometry (DESI-HRMS) for the analysis of unknown materials. To this end, our study focused on analyzing an unknown complex sample suspected of being an adulterated phytosanitary product or a fraud. A simple and fast sample manipulation procedure (filter paper impregnated with the sample) was used for the chemical characterization of the phytosanitary product by DESI-HRMS(/MS). Kendrick Mass Defect (KMD) analysis was used to process the DESI high-resolution mass spectral data, allowing the identification of a low molecular weight polymer (polyethylene glycol) and the detection of other ions, which did not follow polymer distributions. The characteristic isotope patterns of these ions suggested the presence of organometallic compounds. Accurate mass measurements, isotope pattern fits and the structural information obtained by DESI-MS/HRMS (wide isolation window) allowed identifying the presence of triphenyltin, a biocide extensively used for agricultural purposes and restricted by the European Commission, in the phytosanitary product. The concentration of triphenyltin in the sample was 35%, which corresponds to 12% expressed as weight of tin, 120 times higher than the maximum legislated level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据