4.4 Article

Fast and wild: Bootstrap inference in Stata using boottest

期刊

STATA JOURNAL
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 4-60

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1536867X19830877

关键词

st0549; boottest; artest; waldtest; scoretest; Anderson-Rubin test; Wald test; wild bootstrap; wild cluster bootstrap; score bootstrap; multiway clustering; few treated clusters

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chairs program
  3. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
  4. Center for Research in Econometric Analysis of Time Series (CREATES)
  5. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF78]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The wild bootstrap was originally developed for regression models with heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Over the past 30 years, it has been extended to models estimated by instrumental variables and maximum likelihood and to ones where the error terms are (perhaps multiway) clustered. Like bootstrap methods in general, the wild bootstrap is especially useful when conventional inference methods are unreliable because large-sample assumptions do not hold. For example, there may be few clusters, few treated clusters, or weak instruments. The package boottest can perform a wide variety of wild bootstrap tests, often at remarkable speed. It can also invert these tests to construct confidence sets. As a postestimation command, boottest works after linear estimation commands, including regress, cnsreg, ivregress, ivreg2, areg, and reghdfe, as well as many estimation commands based on maximum likelihood. Although it is designed to perform the wild cluster bootstrap, boottest can also perform the ordinary (nonclustered) version. Wrappers offer classical Wald, score/Lagrange multiplier, and Anderson-Rubin tests, optionally with (multiway) clustering. We review the main ideas of the wild cluster bootstrap, offer tips for use, explain why it is particularly amenable to computational optimization, state the syntax of boottest, artest, scoretest, and waldtest, and present several empirical examples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据