4.3 Article

Self-Healing Hydrogel of Poly (Vinyl Alcohol)/Agarose with Robust Mechanical Property

期刊

STARCH-STARKE
卷 71, 期 5-6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/star.201800281

关键词

dual network hydrogels; mechanical properties; physical cross-linking; self-healing properties; thermal properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41576098, 81773483]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province of China [2016C33176, LGF18B070002]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo [2017A610231, 2017A610228, 2017A610069]
  4. K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As promising soft materials, various excellent properties of hydrogels have received widespread attention during recent years. Mechanical properties and self-healing performance are required characteristics for hydrogels in practical applications. An important challenge is to develop hydrogels exhibiting mechanical performance and self-recoverability through physical cross-linking. In this work, the authors report a hydrogel consisting of a fully physically linked poly (vinyl alcohol)/agarose (PVA/AG) dual-network, which is of high toughness and self-healing properties. The synthesis process of the PVA/AG hydrogel is convenient, with AG as the first network, and hydrogen bonding and crystal-associated PVA as the second network to form a dual physical crosslink. Due to this physical cross-linking, the PVA/AG hydrogel has good mechanical properties (tensile strength of 6.5MPa to 14.6MPa, ductility of 168% to 214%). The highest compressive strength of hydrogel is up to 3.66MPa, which is almost 8 times that of pure PVA hydrogel. In addition, it has excellent self-healing properties without stimulation or healing agents. Compared to pure PVA hydrogel, PVA/AG hydrogels have higher thermal stability due to higher decomposition temperatures and lower degradation rates. In this study, the authors also initially explore the potential application of obtained hydrogel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据