4.7 Article

Kinetics of complex formation of Fe(III) with caffeic acid: Experimental and theoretical study

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2018.11.059

关键词

Fe(III); Caffeic acid; Complex; Kinetics; Apparent kinetic data; DFT

资金

  1. RGNF, UGC, New Delhi [F1-17.1/2017-18/RGNF-2017-18-SC-UTT-38429/(SA-III/Website)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kinetic study on the complexation of caffeic acid with ferric chloride was performed in aqueous solution at pH 9.0. The complex was characterized by IR, UV-Vis spectroscopy and FE-SEM techniques. Kinetic data were obtained and used to model the reaction kinetics for the disappearance of the caffeic acid. The operational variables have been studied in the temperature range from 25 to 45 degrees C, initial iron and caffeic acid concentration from 0.6 mg/100 ml (ranging from 2.0 ml to 8 ml/100 ml). The complexation reaction was found to be a first-order with rate constants for k(1) (formation) 4.7 x 10(-3) s(-1). Additionally, the effect of concentration and temperature on the complexation reaction was investigated. Apparent kinetic parameters of the complex formation of Fe(III) with caffeic acid were found as; pre-exponential factor A (-1.17 min(-1)), enthalpy of activation (Delta H degrees)# (-2188 J mol(-1)), entropy of activation, (Delta S degrees)# (-7.34 J mol(-1) K-1) and Gibbs free energy of activation, (Delta G degrees)#(-0.68 J). The apparent activation energy of the complexation reaction was evaluated to be 289.29 J mol(-1) which is consistent with the chemistry of Fe(III) with polyphenols which are supposed to mimic the interaction of Fe(III) with transferrin in biological media. Various theoretical parameters of the studied complex such as hardness, electronegativity, softness, total energy, dipole moment and point group symmetry were calculated employing Density functional theory (DFT) and found as 0.04465,0.2130,22.39, 0.5201 x 10(-8) eV, 15.13 Debye, and C1, respectively, (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据