4.6 Article

Hybridizing cuckoo search algorithm with biogeography-based optimization for estimating photovoltaic model parameters

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 192-206

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.025

关键词

Parameter estimation; Photovoltaic modeling; Hybrid meta-heuristic; Cuckoo search; Biogeography-based optimization

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK 20160540]
  2. Research Talents Startup Foundation of Jiangsu University [15JDG139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate estimation of model parameters plays a very important role in modeling solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. In the past decade, meta-heuristic algorithms (MHAs) have been used as promising methods for solving this problem. However, due to the non-linearity and multi-modality existed in the problem, many HMAs may present unsatisfactory performance due to their premature or slow convergence. Therefore, how to develop algorithms efficiently balancing the exploration and exploitation, and identify the PV model parameters accurately and reliably is still a big challenge. In this paper, to improve parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic models, we propose a hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm, called biogeography-based heterogeneous cuckoo search (BHCS) algorithm. Specifically, BHCS hybridizes cuckoo search (CS) and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) by employing two search strategies, namely heterogeneous cuckoo search and biogeography-based discovery. The cooperation of the two strategies helps BHCS achieve an efficient balance between exploration and exploitation. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm is applied to solve four parameters estimation problems of different photovoltaic models, including single diode model, double diode model and two PV panel modules. Experimental results demonstrate that BHCS has very competitive performance in terms of accuracy and reliability compared with CS, BBO and several other meta-heuristic algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据