4.1 Review

A Review on Heavy Metals Contamination in Soil: Effects, Sources, and Remediation Techniques

期刊

SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 380-394

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15320383.2019.1592108

关键词

Heavy metals; sources; remediation techniques; phytoremediation; hyperaccumulator

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Project to Create New Crop Cultivars using Gene Transfer Technology [2016ZX08005001-009]
  2. President Youth Innovation Fund of Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences [17B0133]
  3. Group Project of Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences [18C0731]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil heavy metal pollution has become a worldwide environmental issue that has attracted considerable public attention, largely from the increasing concern for the security of agricultural products. Heavy metals refer to some metals and metalloids possessing biological toxicity, such as cadmium, mercury, arsenic, lead, and chromium. These elements enter the soil agro-ecosystem through natural processes derived from parent materials, and through anthropogenic activities. Heavy metal pollution poses a great threat to the health and well-being of organisms and human beings due to potential accumulation risk through the food chain. Remediation using chemical, physical, and biological methods has been adopted to solve the problem. Phytoremediation has proven to be a promising alternative to conventional approaches as it is cost effective, environmentally friendly, and aesthetically pleasing. To date, based on the natural ability of extraction, approximately 500 taxa have been identified as hyperaccumulators of one or more metals. In addition, further research integrating biotechnological approaches with comprehensive multidisciplinary research is needed to improve plant tolerance and reduce the accumulation of toxic metals in soils. This review discusses harmful effects, sources of heavy metals, and the remediation technologies for soil contaminated by heavy metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据