4.8 Article

Water-Dispersible Candle Soot-Derived Carbon Nano-Onion Clusters for Imaging-Guided Photothermal Cancer Therapy

期刊

SMALL
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201804575

关键词

candle soot; carbon nano-onion; photoacoustic imaging; photothermal therapy; theranostic agent

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673037]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170078]
  3. Innovative and Entrepreneurial Talent Recruitment Program of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, water-dispersible carbon nano-onion clusters (CNOCs) with an average hydrodynamic size of approximate to 90 nm are prepared by simply sonicating candle soot in a mixture of oxidizing acid. The obtained CNOCs have high photothermal conversion efficiency (57.5%), excellent aqueous dispersibility (stable in water for more than a year without precipitation), and benign biocompatibility. After polyethylenirnine (PEI) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) modification, the resultant CNOCs-PEI-PEG have a high photothermal conversion efficiency (56.5%), and can realize after-wash photothermal cancer cell ablation due to their ultrahigh cellular uptake (21.3 pg/cell), which is highly beneficial for the selective ablation of cancer cells via light-triggered intracellular heat generation. More interestingly, the cellular uptake of CNOCs-PEI-PEG is so high that the internalized nanoagents can be directly observed under a microscope without fluorescent labeling. Besides, in vivo experiments reveal that CNOCs-PEI-PEG can be used for photothermal photoacoustic dual-modal imaging-guided photothermal therapy after intravenous administration. Furthermore, CNOCs-PEI-PEG can be efficiently cleared from the mouse body within a week, ensuring their excellent longterm biosafety. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the first example of using candle soot as raw material to prepare water-dispersible onion-like carbon nanomaterials for cancer theranostics is represented herein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据