4.8 Article

Remarkable Improvement in Photocatalytic Performance for Tannery Wastewater Processing via SnS2 Modified with N-Doped Carbon Quantum Dots: Synthesis, Characterization, and 4-Nitrophenol-Aided Cr(VI) Photoreduction

期刊

SMALL
卷 15, 期 29, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201804515

关键词

carbon quantum dots; green chemistry; in situ synthesis; photogenerated charge carrier; tannery wastewater processing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21671077, 21771075, 21571176, 21871106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalytic pathways are proved crucial for the sustainable production of chemicals and fuels required for a pollution-free planet. Electron-hole recombination is a critical problem that has, so far, limited the efficiency of the most promising photocatalytic materials. Here, the efficacy of the 0D N doped carbon quantum dots (N-CQDs) is demonstrated in accelerating the charge separation and transfer and thereby boosting the activity of a narrow-bandgap SnS2 photocatalytic system. N-CQDs are in situ loaded onto SnS2 nanosheets in forming N-CQDs/SnS2 composite via an electrostatic interaction under hydrothermal conditions. Cr(VI) photoreduction rate of N-CQDs/SnS2 is highly enhanced by engineering the loading contents of N-CQDs, in which the optimal N-CQDs/SnS2 with 40 mol% N-CQDs exhibits a remarkable Cr(VI) photoreduction rate of 0.148 min(-1), about 5-time and 148-time higher than that of SnS2 and N-CQDs, respectively. Examining the photoexcited charges via zeta potential, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), surface photovoltage, and electrochemical impedance spectra indicate that the improved Cr(VI) photodegradation rate is linked to the strong electrostatic attraction between N-CQDs and SnS2 nanosheets in composite, which favors efficient carrier utilization. To further boost the carrier utilization, 4-nitrophenol is introduced in this photocatalytic system and the efficiency of Cr(VI) photoreduction is further promoted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据