4.7 Article

Bio-inspired superhydrophobic and superoleophilic nanofibrous membranes for non-aqueous solvent and oil separation from water

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 587-599

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.08.038

关键词

Electrospinning; Electrospraying; Nanofibrous membrane; Oil/water separation; Superhydrophobic; Superoleophilic

资金

  1. Center of Excellence in Produced Water Management (CEPWM) at the University of Wyoming

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The separation of apolar, or non-aqueous, solvents from polar ones is an important challenge in water and wastewater treatment applications. Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic membranes present unique opportunities for such separations. Inspired by the lotus leaf effect, superhydrophobic membranes were prepared having hierarchical surface roughness made of carbon black nanoparticles. A hydrophobic nanofibrous support was produced through electrospinning using polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene (PVDF-HFP). Hydrophobic carbon black nanoparticles were then coated onto the support via an electrospraying technique under varying conditions to generate surfaces having unique micro- and nano-scale roughness features. Membranes made using a polymer concentration of 8% w/w and nanoparticle to polymer ratio of 1 showed the smallest bead size (4.9 +/- 2.0 mu m(2)) and highest bead area density (74.3%), with corresponding average and root mean square roughness values of 3.69 +/- 0.07 mu m and 4.63 +/- 0.05 mu m, respectively. When tested for surface wettability, the prepared membrane showed water contact angle, sliding angle and contact angle hysteresis values of 160.8 degrees, 7.0 degrees and 5.3 degrees, respectively; however, liquids with surface tensions <= 36.6 mN/m had zero contact angle on the membrane surface (superoleophilicity). The optimized membrane showed significantly higher gravity-driven flux (1275-2163 LMH) than the nanofibrous support membrane (933-1424 LMH) for the tested non-aqueous solvents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据