4.7 Article

Systematic approach for screening organic and ionic liquid solvents in homogeneous extractive distillation exemplified by the tert-butanol dehydration

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 211, 期 -, 页码 723-737

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.10.030

关键词

Organic solvents; Ionic liquids; Homogeneous extractive distillation; Entrainer screening; tert-Butanol dehydration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878028, 21606026]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [106112017CDJQJ228809]
  3. Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology [CSTC2016JCYJA0474]
  4. Hundred Talents Program of Chongqing University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic strategy for the screening of organic solvents and ionic liquids as entrainers along with the design of the corresponding homogeneous extractive distillation processes has been developed. The proposed approach is illustrated by an example of the entrainer screening in the dehydration of tert-butanol. The toxicity and the physical properties of two types of entrainers (e.g., 19 organic solvents and 289 ionic liquids) are first considered. Then, the properties related to separation performance are further evaluated and three organic solvents and 11 ionic liquids are found to conform to the process feasible restrictions. In the third step, glycerol, tiethylene glycol, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium thiocyanide [C4MIM] [SCN), and 1-pentyl-3-methylimidazolium thiocyanide [C5MIM][SCN] are chosen as the representatives to perform thermodynamic topological analysis. Finally, the process design and optimization with four entrainers are performed using the minimization of total annualized cost as the objective function. And the process economic evaluation proves that the ability of glycerol in separating tert-butanol-water system is superior to those of 18 organic solvents candidates while that of [C4MIM] [SCN] is the most advantageous entrainer among 289 ILs in terms of saving energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据