4.7 Article

A novel electrochemical sensor for ochratoxin A based on the hairpin aptamer and double report DNA via multiple signal amplification strategy

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 281, 期 -, 页码 595-601

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.10.148

关键词

Electrochemical aptasensor; Ochratoxin A; Hairpin aptamer; Au nanoparticles; Trithiocyanuric acid

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81302472, 81573313, 81600179]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2242017K41018, 2242018K40022]
  3. universities in Jiangsu

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel electrochemical sensor for ochratoxin A (OTA) based on the hairpin aptamer (HA) and double report DNA was constructed successfully. In the work, HA was chosen as the OTA recognition element and immobilized on the gold electrode (GE) via Au-S. Au nanoparticles (AuNPs) labeled double report DNA (rDNA1 and rDNA2) were symmetrically hybridized with HA simultaneously. Compared to the single report DNA, the strategy can dramatically increase the amount of AuNPs on the electrode surface and the stability of the HA to prevent lodging. The signal amplification was further implemented by using trithiocyanuric acid (TCA) to aggregate the AuNPs. Thus, it was observed that the differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) response of AuNPs was significantly amplified via multiple signal amplification strategy. When OTA was present, the HA was specifically combined with OTA to form the OTA-HA complex, which caused double report DNA to detach from the electrode, resulting in the decrease of the DPV response. The proposed electrochemical aptasensor can sensitively detect low concentrations of OTA by monitoring the OTA-dependent DPV intensity change. Under the optimized conditions, it exhibited wide linear ranges from 1 pg mL(-1) to 1 ng mL(-1) with a low detection limit of 0.5 pg mL(-1). The work provides a new idea for the various mycotoxins and even other substances detection at trace level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据