4.6 Article

Learning the Cost Function for Foothold Selection in a Quadruped Robot

期刊

SENSORS
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s19061292

关键词

quadruped robot; foothold selection; TOF camera; 2.5D elevation map; supporting vector machine

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2572017BB12]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System (HIT) Open Fund [SKLRS-2017-KF-06]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [16051575097]
  4. National Science Foundation for Post-doctoral Scientists of China [2015M571381, 2017T100217]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [JJ2019LH2071]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper is focused on designing a cost function of selecting a foothold for a physical quadruped robot walking on rough terrain. The quadruped robot is modeled with Denavit-Hartenberg (DH) parameters, and then a default foothold is defined based on the model. Time of Flight (TOF) camera is used to perceive terrain information and construct a 2.5D elevation map, on which the terrain features are detected. The cost function is defined as the weighted sum of several elements including terrain features and some features on the relative pose between the default foothold and other candidates. It is nearly impossible to hand-code the weight vector of the function, so the weights are learned using Supporting Vector Machine (SVM) techniques, and the training data set is generated from the 2.5D elevation map of a real terrain under the guidance of experts. Four candidate footholds around the default foothold are randomly sampled, and the expert gives the order of such four candidates by rotating and scaling the view for seeing clearly. Lastly, the learned cost function is used to select a suitable foothold and drive the quadruped robot to walk autonomously across the rough terrain with wooden steps. Comparing to the approach with the original standard static gait, the proposed cost function shows better performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据