4.7 Article

Efficient doubled haploid production in microspore culture of Zengcheng flowering Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp chinensis [L.] Makino var. utilis Tsen et Lee)

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 245, 期 -, 页码 57-64

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.09.076

关键词

Zengcheng flowering Chinese cabbage; Microspore culture; L-ascorbic acid sodium salt; Embryogenesis; Doubled haploid lines

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31601749]
  2. National Bulk Vegetable Industry Technical System Vegetable Cell Engineering Breeding Post Expert Special Item [CARS-23-A04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microspore culture has been implemented in breeding programs to produce doubled haploids (DH) and thus accelerate the breeding process. This study aimed to establish an efficient microspore culture protocol for Zengcheng flowering Chinese cabbage, a highly nutritious and valued vegetable, that would be suitable for heterosis breeding. Microspores of three genotypes, 17AY010, 17AY011, and 17AY012 were successfully induced to produce embryos in NLN-13 medium. Two genotypes, 17AY011 and 17AY012 were cultivated in NLN-13 medium supplemented with different concentrations (0, 0.2, 1, 5 or 25 mu M) of L-ascorbic acid sodium salt (Vitamin C Sodium Salt, VcNa) to enhance microspore embryogenesis and plant regeneration without an intervening callus phase. In both genotypes, the addition of 1 mu M and 0.2 mu M VcNa significantly increased the frequency of embryogenesis, 6.55-fold and 10.33-fold as compared with the control, respectively. The optimum concentration of VcNa application that would improve the rates of direct plant regeneration in the two tested genotypes was 1 mu M. Moreover, the doubled haploid rates of regenerated plants of the three genotypes were above 60%. Five DH lines of 17AY012 with high yield were obtained. According to the measurement of the affinity index, they were prospective self-incompatible lines for hybrid breeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据