4.5 Article

Direct targeting of Gαq and Gα11 oncoproteins in cancer cells

期刊

SCIENCE SIGNALING
卷 12, 期 573, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aau5948

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [FOR2372, KO 1582/10-1, KO 1582/10-2, KO 902/17-1, KO 902/17-2, PF 301/19-1, PF 301/19-2, MO 821/3-1]
  2. DFG [KO4095/3-1, KO4095/4-1, 214362475/GRK1873/2]
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP17gm5910013]
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [17 K08264]
  5. CONACyT (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico) [286274]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Somatic gain-of-function mutations of GNAQ and GNA11, which encode. subunits of heterotrimeric G alpha(q)/11 proteins, occur in about 85% of cases of uveal melanoma (UM), the most common cancer of the adult eye. Molecular therapies to directly target these oncoproteins are lacking, and current treatment options rely on radiation, surgery, or inhibition of effector molecules downstream of these G proteins. A hallmark feature of oncogenic G alpha(q)/11 proteins is their reduced intrinsic rate of hydrolysis of guanosine triphosphate (GTP), which results in their accumulation in the GTP-bound, active state. Here, we report that the cyclic depsipeptide FR900359 (FR) directly interacted with GTPase-deficient G alpha(q)/11 proteins and preferentially inhibited mitogenic ERK signaling rather than canonical phospholipase C beta(PLC beta) signaling driven by these oncogenes. Thereby, FR suppressed the proliferation of melanoma cells in culture and inhibited the growth of G alpha(q)-driven UM mouse xenografts in vivo. In contrast, FR did not affect tumor growth when xenografts carried mutated B-Raf(V600E) as the oncogenic driver. Because FR enabled suppression of malignant traits in cancer cells that are driven by activating mutations at codon 209 in G alpha(q)/11 proteins, we envision that similar approaches could be taken to blunt the signaling of non-G alpha(q)/11 G proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据