4.7 Article

Legacy and alternative flame retardants in house dust and hand wipes from South China

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 656, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.369

关键词

Flame retardant; House dust; Hand wipes; Exposure estimation

资金

  1. Guangdong Innovative and Enterpreneurial Research Team Program [2016ZT06N258]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21777059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study investigated the occurrence of legacy and alternative halogenated flame retardants (FRs) in house dust (n = 51) from Guangzhou, South China and hand wipes collected from adults (n = 51) and children (n = 31). In addition to polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) congeners (particularly BDE-209), several alternative FRs were also detected in > 60% of dust samples, including decabromodiphenylethane (DBDPE; median: 4600 ng/g), bis(2-ethylhexyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromo-phthalate (BEH-TEBP; 43.9 ng/g), 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribormophenoxy) ethane (BTBPE; 9.2 ng/g), pentabromotoluene (PBT; 10.1 ng/g), and syn- and anti-dechlorane plus (DPs, 24.5 ng/g). BDE-47, BDE-209, DBDPE, BEH-TEBP, and DPs were also frequently detected on hand wipes from children (median mass: 0.1-1.1 ng) and adults (0.1-1.2 ng). Linear regression models suggest that dust concentrations of BDE-47 and DPs had significant or marginally significant associations with their masses on children's (10(beta) = 2.82; 95% CI: 1.20, 6.64 and 10(beta) = 5.57, 95% CI: 1.85, 16.75, respectively) and adults' hands (10(beta) = 4.46; 95% CI: 0.92, 21.58 and 10(beta) = 5.11; 95% CI: 1.74, 14.96, respectively), whereas no association was observed for any other FRs. Most of the investigated demographic, environmental, or behavioral factors did not significantly influence the levels of halogenated FRs on human hands. Estimation of human exposure risks via hand-to-mouth contact and dust ingestion indicates that children are subjected to elevated exposure than adults, and the relative importance of the two pathways is chemical-specific. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据