4.7 Article

Comparative analysis of statistical methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Bostanlik District, Uzbekistan

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 653, 期 -, 页码 801-814

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.431

关键词

Landslide; Inventory; Statistical index; Frequency ratio; Certainty factor; Evaluation

资金

  1. TIMUR (Training of Individuals through Mobility to EU from the Uzbek Republic) project - Erasmus Mundus Action 2 program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Bostanlik district, Uzbekistan, is characterized bymountainous terrain susceptible to landslides. The present study aims at creating a statistically derived landslide susceptibilitymap-the first of its type for Uzbekistan-for part of the area in order to inform risk management. Statistical index (SI), frequency ratio (FR) and certainty factor (CF) are employed and compared for this purpose. Ten predictor layers are used for the analysis, including geology, soil, land use and land cover, slope, aspect, elevation, distance to lineaments, distance to faults, distance to roads, and distance to streams. 170 landslide polygons are mapped based on GeoEye-1 and Google Earth imagery. 119 (70%) out of them are randomly selected and used for the training of the methods, whereas 51 (30%) are retained for the evaluation of the results. The three landslide susceptibility maps are split into five classes, i. e. very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. The evaluation of the results obtained builds on the area under the success rate and prediction rate curves (AUC). The training accuracies are 82.1%, 74.3% and 74%, while the prediction accuracies are 80%, 70% and 71%, for the SI, FR and CF methods, respectively. The spatial relationships between the landslides and the predictor layers confirmed the results of previous studies conducted in other areas, whereasmodel performancewas slightly higher than in some earlier studies-possibly a benefit of the polygonbased landslide inventory. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据